Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I don't currently have an FC5 box to test with. Here's what to try: move
> the ppport.h aside, and in the plperl directory run this command to
> generate a replacement:
> perl -MDevel::PPPort -e 'Devel::PPPort::WriteFile();'
> and then recompile.
Hm. It compiles without warnings, but the new ppport.h is about 100K
larger than the old one :-(. The change we seem to actually need is
just to put "#ifndef PERL_UNUSED_DECL" around the attempted declaration
of that macro, so I'm inclined to just commit that rather than buy into
everything else that seems to have been done to PPPort lately.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-05-30 14:13:00|
|Subject: Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-05-30 14:01:49|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead by sampling|