| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Raney <raneyt(at)cecs(dot)pdx(dot)edu>, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Explain XML patch v2 |
| Date: | 2008-07-04 16:01:12 |
| Message-ID: | 23468.1215187272@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2008 schrieb Tom Raney:
>> Regarding the XML datum, in order to support that, will all users need
>> to compile with libxml? Are there any lighter weight solutions to
>> serialize other than libxml?
> You can create XML without libxml.
Seems to me that anyone who wants this feature will probably also want
the existing libxml-based features, so they'll be building with libxml
anyway. So I'd not be in favor of expending any extra code on a
roll-your-own solution.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-04 16:05:54 | Re: Sorting writes during checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-04 15:53:56 | Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-04 16:05:54 | Re: Sorting writes during checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-04 13:31:59 | Re: Relation forks & FSM rewrite patches |