Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs
Date: 2009-12-29 15:24:38
Message-ID: 23445.1262100278@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> But it would be broken in very obvious ways, no?  It's not like it would
> be silently broken and thus escape testing ...

Well, if we wanted to adopt that approach, we should add the count to
*all* SELECT tags not just a small subset.  As the patch stands it
seems entirely possible that a breakage would escape immediate notice.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-12-29 15:29:53
Subject: Re: Stats for inheritance trees
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-12-29 15:22:54
Subject: Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group