Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> But it would be broken in very obvious ways, no? It's not like it would
> be silently broken and thus escape testing ...
Well, if we wanted to adopt that approach, we should add the count to
*all* SELECT tags not just a small subset. As the patch stands it
seems entirely possible that a breakage would escape immediate notice.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-12-29 15:29:53|
|Subject: Re: Stats for inheritance trees |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-12-29 15:22:54|
|Subject: Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior |