Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> This is a marvellous win, a huge gain from a small, isolated and
> easily tested change. By far the smallest amount of additional code to
> sorting we will have added and yet one of the best gains.
I think you forgot your cheerleader uniform. A patch along these lines
is not going to be small, isolated, easily maintained, nor beneficial
for any but a small number of predetermined datatypes.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Susanne Ebrecht||Date: 2011-09-21 15:34:02|
|Subject: Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?|
|Previous:||From: YAMAMOTO Takashi||Date: 2011-09-21 15:22:40|
|Subject: BUG #6218: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(owner->nsnapshots == 0)", File: "resowner.c", Line: 365)|