Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: turning of pg_xlog

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
Cc: Jonny <blubb(at)terminalschmiede(dot)de>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: turning of pg_xlog
Date: 2008-09-30 18:44:38
Message-ID: 23386.1222800278@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com> writes:
> You should also understand that if you set checkpoint_segments to a 
> small number, its still possible that PostgreSQL might use more than 
> that number for a large transaction.

"Large transactions" have nothing to do with this.  You are confusing
Postgres' implementation with Oracle's.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Plugge, Joe R.Date: 2008-09-30 18:49:41
Subject: Re: turning of pg_xlog
Previous:From: Chander GanesanDate: 2008-09-30 18:13:52
Subject: Re: turning of pg_xlog

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group