Re: Bug in new memory system?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in new memory system?
Date: 2000-07-01 18:12:10
Message-ID: 23365.962475130@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The reason I'm saying "bug in memory system" is this backtrace:

Good catch. xact.c is being careless about the possibility that
AbortTransaction() can be called when there's not actually any
transaction running. I'm on it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-01 21:15:39 Re: Modified pg_dump & new pg_restore need testing...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-07-01 17:55:56 Re: [PATCHES] TABLEOID patch