Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug in new memory system?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in new memory system?
Date: 2000-07-01 18:12:10
Message-ID: 23365.962475130@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The reason I'm saying "bug in memory system" is this backtrace:

Good catch.  xact.c is being careless about the possibility that
AbortTransaction() can be called when there's not actually any
transaction running.  I'm on it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-07-01 21:15:39
Subject: Re: Modified pg_dump & new pg_restore need testing...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-07-01 17:55:56
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] TABLEOID patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group