Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The reason I'm saying "bug in memory system" is this backtrace:

Good catch.  xact.c is being careless about the possibility that
AbortTransaction() can be called when there's not actually any
transaction running.  I'm on it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Bug in new memory system? at 2000-07-01 15:03:02 from Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2000-07-01 21:15:39
	Subject: Re: Modified pg_dump & new pg_restore need testing...
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2000-07-01 17:55:56
	Subject: Re: [PATCHES] TABLEOID patch