"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> There is an explicit test for whether the transaction has modified
> files; if so the commit is always synchronous, even if explicitly
> requested otherwise. Also, utility commands never perform async commits,
> so overall there aren't that many of the commonly used DDL commands that
> could be performed and still have it be an async commit.
Huh? I see neither a reason for these restrictions nor any way that you
could enforce them without horrid kluges.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2007-07-25 04:21:17|
|Subject: Re: RETURN QUERY|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2007-07-24 21:47:31|
|Subject: Re: msvc and vista fun|