From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | José Soares <jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com> |
Cc: | hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 |
Date: | 1999-08-23 14:21:24 |
Message-ID: | 23255.935418084@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9?= Soares <jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com> writes:
> What does it mean?
> prova=> select nome from prova group by nome having count(*) > 1;
> [ OK ]
> prova=> select oid,* from prova where nome in (select nome from prova
> group by nome having 1 < count(*));
> ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108
> prova=> select * from prova where nome in (select nome from prova group
> by nome having count(*) > 1);
> ERROR: rewrite: aggregate column of view must be at rigth side in qual
I take it you are using 6.4, because 6.5 generates different failure
messages. But it's not any less broken :-(. The rewriter seems to have
a bunch of bugs associated with aggregate functions in HAVING clauses of
sub-selects. Or maybe it's just several manifestations of the same bug.
I have notes about this problem but do not understand it well enough to
fix it. Perhaps Jan has a clue about it...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-08-23 14:23:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Array-fields and many-to-many relations |
Previous Message | José Soares | 1999-08-23 14:02:38 | Re: [HACKERS] RE: [SQL] datediff function |