| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: LIMIT/SORT optimization |
| Date: | 2007-03-14 16:06:32 |
| Message-ID: | 23235.1173888392@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Do people prefer receiving attachments or downloadable links?
> Does the answer change if the patches are quite large?
Links suck from an archival standpoint; but at the same time you need
to pay some attention to the size of your email. I think the current
threshold for moderator approval is somewhere between 50K and 100K
(on patches; less on our other lists). gzipping large patches is
encouraged --- if people's mail readers need help in viewing such
an attachment, that's not your problem.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Huehner | 2007-03-14 16:25:37 | Code-Cleanup: function declarations (void, and k&r style) |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-03-14 15:21:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes |