Chris Storah <cstorah(at)emis-support(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> Is this a bug - should the parser cope with any reserved words as
No, and no. If you could use them as identifiers then they wouldn't
be reserved words, would they?
Some keywords are "more reserved" than others in the Postgres parser;
see the distinction between ColId and ColLabel in gram.y if you want
the details. AFAICT, "CALL" is not a keyword at all in Postgres.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2001-02-15 18:00:17|
|Subject: Re: create table bug with reserved words?|
|Previous:||From: Chris Storah||Date: 2001-02-15 13:12:03|
|Subject: create table bug with reserved words?|