Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Change draft gmake control

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change draft gmake control
Date: 2007-01-27 21:19:16
Message-ID: 23143.1169932756@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Well, if 'draft' was only for html, I could see suggesting just 'gmake
> draft', but 'draft' can be used for Postscript and PDF too.

But those aren't cases where saving some typing is useful (in fact,
I'd bet money that no one will ever use them).  Draft runs with html
output are highly useful, and like Peter I think "make draft" ought
to work for that.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-27 22:47:01
Subject: Re: Change draft gmake control
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-01-27 20:47:55
Subject: Re: [pgsql-patches] Change draft gmake control

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-27 22:47:01
Subject: Re: Change draft gmake control
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-27 21:17:11
Subject: Re: Ctid chain following enhancement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group