Re: SPI & file locations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Peterson <rpeterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI & file locations
Date: 2000-05-26 16:12:55
Message-ID: 2304.959357575@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Ron Peterson <rpeterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com> writes:
> After installation, shouldn't everything you need be in
> /usr/local/pgsql?

Yeah, it should really. We've had this discussion before. The real
problem is that no one wants to install the entire pgsql include tree,
but it's hard to draw the line at what an SPI extension might need or
not need. It doesn't help that we've been sloppy about what lives in
which include file, too :-(. Sooner or later someone should go through
the whole include tree and try to rearrange things so that there's a
fairly compact set of files that need to be exported.

In the meantime, pointing at the source tree is a good way to build SPI
extensions...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bryan White 2000-05-26 16:16:13 Re: PG 7.0 is 2.5 times slower running a big report
Previous Message Steve Wampler 2000-05-26 16:09:01 Re: Speed of locating tables?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-26 16:26:06 Re: aliases break my query
Previous Message Karel Zak 2000-05-26 16:06:47 possible bug in RI?