Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SPI & file locations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Peterson <rpeterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI & file locations
Date: 2000-05-26 16:12:55
Message-ID: 2304.959357575@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Ron Peterson <rpeterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com> writes:
> After installation, shouldn't everything you need be in
> /usr/local/pgsql?

Yeah, it should really.  We've had this discussion before.  The real
problem is that no one wants to install the entire pgsql include tree,
but it's hard to draw the line at what an SPI extension might need or
not need.  It doesn't help that we've been sloppy about what lives in
which include file, too :-(.  Sooner or later someone should go through
the whole include tree and try to rearrange things so that there's a
fairly compact set of files that need to be exported.

In the meantime, pointing at the source tree is a good way to build SPI
extensions...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-05-26 16:26:06
Subject: Re: aliases break my query
Previous:From: Karel ZakDate: 2000-05-26 16:06:47
Subject: possible bug in RI?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Bryan WhiteDate: 2000-05-26 16:16:13
Subject: Re: PG 7.0 is 2.5 times slower running a big report
Previous:From: Steve WamplerDate: 2000-05-26 16:09:01
Subject: Re: Speed of locating tables?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group