Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FPI

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FPI
Date: 2011-01-28 18:42:43
Message-ID: 23024.1296240163@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Say what? A heap deletion compacts the page --- it will certainly fail
>> badly on torn-page.

> What do you mean by "compacts the page"?  I would interpret that to
> mean "reclaims the space formerly used by the tuple being deleted",
> but it certainly can't do that.

Oh, I'm sorry, I was confusing the case with vacuum cleanup.  Obviously
hadn't consumed any caffeine yet.  Nevermind ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: FPI at 2011-01-28 18:36:45 from Robert Haas

Responses

  • Re: FPI at 2011-01-28 19:11:52 from Robert Haas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-28 18:52:32
Subject: Re: ALTER TYPE 3: add facility to identify further no-work cases
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2011-01-28 18:41:35
Subject: Re: WIP: RangeTypes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group