Re: PG 7.0.3 & RH 7 IPC problems?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stefan Huber <schweinsaug(at)crosswinds(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 7.0.3 & RH 7 IPC problems?
Date: 2001-03-29 17:55:54
Message-ID: 23013.985888554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Stefan Huber <schweinsaug(at)crosswinds(dot)net> writes:
> <kill -9 postmaster_pid snipped>
>> 7.1 uses a slightly different approach that hopefully avoids this
>> particular failure scenario...

> Is there any information availible _how_ this is avoided?

We try to remove and recreate, rather than just reuse, an existing
Postgres-owned segment. Reuse worked fine as long as the segment
size was >= what we were asking for, but otherwise not so fine...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-29 18:13:04 Re: search on accents -> Why not include this function
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-29 17:53:55 Re: PG 7.0.3 & RH 7 IPC problems?