Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date: 2003-03-13 05:37:58
Message-ID: 2296.1047533878@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> It's upgrading the database that's likely to be the driving motivation
> for new sql or storage features. People usually don't get excited
> about upgrading the client libraries :)

Usually not.  This cycle might be different though, if we are able to
finish the proposed improvements in error reporting and other issues
that are handicapping clients.  None of that work will help un-upgraded
clients...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-03-13 06:06:21
Subject: Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-03-13 05:34:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL99 ARRAY support proposal

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2003-03-13 06:29:19
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Previous:From: Barry LindDate: 2003-03-13 02:27:57
Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group