Re: [PATCHES] TABLEOID patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers-oo(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers-oo(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] TABLEOID patch
Date: 2000-07-01 17:55:56
Message-ID: 22943.962474156@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is the tableoid patch. If there are no objections can I have
> this applied?

I definitely object to the tests of tableoid that you have attached to
the inherit regress test. Don't you realize that anything that depends
on another installation matching the exact same OIDs you have is pretty
much guaranteed to fail?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-07-01 18:12:10 Re: Bug in new memory system?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-07-01 17:37:21 Re: Big 7.1 open items

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-01 20:49:46 Re: to_date/char (fwd)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-07-01 15:04:11 Re: to_date/char (fwd)