Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Actually, once you build it this way, you could make all writes
>> synchronous (open the files O_SYNC) so that there is never any need for
>> explicit fsync at checkpoint time.
> Or maybe fdatasync() would be slightly more efficient - do we care about
> flushing metadata that much?
We don't, but it would just obscure the discussion to spell out "fsync,
or fdatasync where available" ...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-11-04 17:31:21|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-11-04 17:07:34|
|Subject: Re: bufmgr code question |