Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> + While a Log-Shipping Standby Server (<xref linkend="warm-standby">) can
> + be upgraded, the server must be in changed to a primary server to allow
> + writes, and after the upgrade it cannot be reused as a standby server.
> + (Running <command>rsync</> after the upgrade allows reuse.)
"in changed"? This sentence makes no sense at all to me.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-07-10 16:17:15|
|Subject: Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-07-10 16:02:48|
|Subject: Re: Re: Allow replacement of bloated primary key indexes without foreign key rebuilds|