Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> +    While a Log-Shipping Standby Server (<xref linkend="warm-standby">) can
> +    be upgraded, the server must be in changed to a primary server to allow
> +    writes, and after the upgrade it cannot be reused as a standby server.
> +    (Running <command>rsync</> after the upgrade allows reuse.)

"in changed"?  This sentence makes no sense at all to me.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers at 2012-07-10 15:50:18 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers at 2012-07-10 16:17:15 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2012-07-10 16:17:15
	Subject: Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-07-10 16:02:48
	Subject: Re: Re: Allow replacement of bloated primary key indexes without foreign key rebuilds