Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
Date: 2012-07-10 16:04:50
Message-ID: 22820.1341936290@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> +    While a Log-Shipping Standby Server (<xref linkend="warm-standby">) can
> +    be upgraded, the server must be in changed to a primary server to allow
> +    writes, and after the upgrade it cannot be reused as a standby server.
> +    (Running <command>rsync</> after the upgrade allows reuse.)

"in changed"?  This sentence makes no sense at all to me.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-07-10 16:17:15
Subject: Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-07-10 16:02:48
Subject: Re: Re: Allow replacement of bloated primary key indexes without foreign key rebuilds

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group