Re: Proposal: new large object API

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new large object API
Date: 2008-03-21 15:45:11
Message-ID: 22799.1206114311@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Ok, here is the revised patch.

This looks sane to me, but I'd suggest leaving out the mention of 8.4
in the docs. Actually, I'm not sure you need a paragraph at all ---
just adding an example would be enough, I think.

SELECT lo_unlink(173454); -- deletes large object with OID 173454

INSERT INTO image (name, raster)
VALUES ('beautiful image', lo_import('/etc/motd'));
+
+ INSERT INTO image (name, raster) -- same as above, but specify OID to use
+ VALUES ('beautiful image', lo_import('/etc/motd', 68583));

SELECT lo_export(image.raster, '/tmp/motd') FROM image
WHERE name = 'beautiful image';
</programlisting>

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-21 15:47:52 Re: Commit Fest (was Re: Sort Refinement)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-21 15:30:34 Re: Commit Fest (was Re: Sort Refinement)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-21 15:53:01 Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-21 15:18:41 Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1