Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On mn, 2011-04-25 at 15:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, it's not just to be "helpful", it's to close off code paths that
>> are never going to be sufficiently well-tested to not have bizarre
>> failure modes. That helps both developers (who don't have to worry
>> about testing/fixing such code paths) and users (who won't have to
>> deal with the bizarre failure modes).
> That's of course another good reason.
Hm, does that mean we have consensus on treating it as an error?
If not, would some other people care to cast votes?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-04-25 23:24:20|
|Subject: Re: Improving the memory allocator|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-04-25 23:17:57|
|Subject: Re: branching for 9.2devel|