Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I have noticed that AND and TRAILING could be made ColLabel's without
> further changes.  Currently they are completely reserved.  (This is
> especially odd given that OR is a ColLabel.)  Would that be okay to
> change?

If you don't get shift/reduce conflicts, go for it.

> (For the interested, the only other completely reserved tokens are TYPE
> and AS.)

I suspect we're stuck on that for AS.  However, TYPE is actually allowed
as a ColId, via the 'generic' production, so in reality it's not
reserved.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Missing ColLabel tokens at 2001-01-04 20:31:11 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

• Re: Missing ColLabel tokens at 2001-01-04 22:33:13 from Peter Eisentraut
• Re: Missing ColLabel tokens at 2001-01-05 10:49:41 from Hannu Krosing

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Dave VanAuken	Date: 2001-01-04 22:04:50
	Subject: running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD 4.2
Previous:	From: Ron Peterson	Date: 2001-01-04 21:24:18
	Subject: md5 c code