Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On Sunday 14 February 2010 18:11:39 Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems to me that we're talking about a huge hit in both code
>> complexity and performance to deal with a problem that doesn't actually
>> occur in the field; and which furthermore is trivially solved on any
>> modern filesystem by choosing the right filesystem options. Why don't
>> we just document those options, instead?
> Which options would that be? I am not aware that there any for any of the
> recent linux filesystems.
Shouldn't journaling of metadata be sufficient?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2010-02-14 18:25:11|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on SMP Architectures|
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2010-02-14 17:27:00|
|Subject: Re: Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Federico Di Gregorio||Date: 2010-02-14 17:37:25|
|Subject: Re: psycopg2 license changed|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-02-14 17:35:41|
|Subject: Re: Streaming Replication docs|