Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, teramoto(dot)junji(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for
Date: 2006-09-02 14:27:14
Message-ID: 2264.1157207234@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom, should I apply this patch now? Are you still considering other
> options for this?

Please wait. This issue is very far down the to-list in terms of size
or significance ... but I'll get to it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-02 14:30:06 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new variable "server_version_num", which is almost the same
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-02 14:25:15 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow PL/python to return composite types and result sets Sven

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-02 17:06:28 Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-02 13:14:06 Re: Simplifying "standby mode"