Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Date: 1999-10-26 14:01:59
Message-ID: 22606.940946519@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Sounds good.  My only question is whether people need backward
> compatibility, and whether we can remove the compatiblity part of the
> interface and small overhead after 7.1 or later?

I think we could drop it after a decent interval, but I don't see any
reason to be in a hurry.  I do think that we'll get complaints if 7.0
doesn't have any backward compatibility for existing user functions.

			regards, tom lane

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: saadDate: 1999-10-26 14:17:37
Subject: what the hell telnet is
Previous:From: Fernando SchapachnikDate: 1999-10-26 12:47:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group