Re: Backend dies for DBI

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bjorn Solberg <bjorn(at)geocities(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backend dies for DBI
Date: 2001-03-08 00:49:05
Message-ID: 22575.984012545@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Bjorn Solberg <bjorn(at)geocities(dot)com> writes:
> The log file from postmaster simply says:

> --->
> StartTransactionCommand
> [...]
> ProcessQuery
> CommitTransactionCommand
> proc_exit(0)
> shmem_exit(0)
> exit(0)
> /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster: reaping dead processes...
> /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster: CleanupProc: pid 1297 exited with status 0
> proc_exit(0)
> shmem_exit(0)
> exit(0)
> /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster: reaping dead processes...
> /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster: CleanupProc: pid 1298 exited with status 0
> ---<

This looks absolutely normal --- there's no evidence here for anything
except normal backend exit. At least the backend thinks it's normal.
You should be looking for client or protocol-level problems.

> DBI (I think) sometimes output a message like "Backend message type 0x50
> arrived while idle". This can happen several times, and the crash does
> not occur directly following any of the messages.

This may indicate running out of memory for a query result on the client
side; libpq is not very graceful about dealing with that :-(. You
should check on the sizes of query results you are fetching and the
amount of memory available to your DBI applications. Fetching a few
rows at a time via a CURSOR is a good workaround if that seems to be
the problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bjorn Halvor Solberg 2001-03-08 01:14:05 Re: Backend dies for DBI
Previous Message Timothy H. Keitt 2001-03-08 00:03:26 unbuffered results from libpq?