Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Date: 2000-10-11 14:03:00
Message-ID: 22555.971272980@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de> writes:
> I would even propose 'idle (transaction open)' if you agree. (Seemed too
> long for me)

No, the ps strings have got to be *short*.  A lot of platforms have a
tight limit on how much command string ps will show.  I thought 'trans'
was OK, though perhaps someone has an even better idea?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-10-11 14:54:17
Subject: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Previous:From: Adam LangDate: 2000-10-11 13:37:52
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-10-11 14:54:17
Subject: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Previous:From: Christof PetigDate: 2000-10-11 06:54:29
Subject: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group