Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types [1 of 2]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types [1 of 2]
Date: 2008-09-09 12:11:45
Message-ID: 22555.1220962305@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
"Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am assuming you are seeing this error in the uint_test1.sql:
>     ERROR:  could not find hash function for hash operator 16524
> I can bypass the error in uint_test1.sql by disabling the hash joins.
> I am going to dig in and figure out why the hashjoin operation is broken.

Well, the cause of that one would've been marking an operator as HASHES
without providing a hash opclass to back it up.

IIRC the test case involved ">"?  That shouldn't even be marked HASHES
anyway ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Brendan JurdDate: 2008-09-09 12:46:16
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation
Previous:From: Brendan JurdDate: 2008-09-09 11:04:39
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group