markw(at)osdl(dot)org writes:
> 7.4beta5 offers more throughput. One significant difference I see is in
> the oprofile for the database. For the additional 7% increase in the
> metric, there are about 32% less ticks in SearchCatCache.
Hmm. I have been profiling PG for some years now, and I cannot remember
ever seeing a profile in which SearchCatCache topped everything else
(the usual suspects for me are palloc/pfree support code). Can you give
any explanation why it looks like that? Can your profiling code tell
where the hotspot call sites of SearchCatCache are?
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Michael Mauger | Date: 2003-11-01 06:51:44 |
| Subject: Proposal: psql force prompting on notty |
| Previous: | From: Bruce Momjian | Date: 2003-11-01 05:16:56 |
| Subject: Re: Vacuum thoughts |