| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, Omar Kilani <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-10-27 17:47:40 |
| Message-ID: | 22519.1098899260@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Ned Lilly wrote:
>> I like it too, very much. Only question is, how does the design scale
>> to 800x600, which should probably still be the minimum?
> I seriously doubt anyone trying to use PostgreSQL is stuck at 800x600.
> 1024x768 is probably good enough. It does fix in 1024x768 btw :)
One thing that annoys the heck out of me is webpage designers who think
I should use a full-screen window to look at their pages. Yes, I have
a large monitor; no, you can't have it all.
If the design doesn't adapt to a smaller window reasonably gracefully,
it's broken.
In this case, about all I could see without scrolling right was the
content-free logo and picture ... so I wasn't real impressed.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ned Lilly | 2004-10-27 17:54:10 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-10-27 17:08:14 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ned Lilly | 2004-10-27 17:54:10 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-10-27 17:08:14 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |