Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Since the problem might actually occur in practice and the fix seems to
> have little chance of inducing a regression, I'm thinking of applying
> this to both HEAD and back branches. Barring any objections I'll do that
> later today or early tomorrow.
Looks alright to me. I agree with backpatching as far back as we have
PG_TRY. The reason for the FIXME was that there wasn't any simple way
to fix it before that ...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Qingqing Zhou||Date: 2005-12-29 19:18:16|
|Subject: Re: Fix spinlock usage in UnpinBuffer()|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-12-29 18:13:25|
|Subject: Re: Fix spinlock usage in UnpinBuffer() |