Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> I had a request from a customer asking if we could make a switch to
>> specifically disable the "unexpected EOF" message that fills lots of
>> peoples logs.
> Yes, if the new parameter allows a generic filter on multiple
> user-specified message types.
I agree with Simon --- a disable for that specific message seems like a
kluge, and an ugly one at that. (The right solution for this customer
is to fix their broken application.) But a generic filter capability
might be useful enough to justify its keep.
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Merlin Moncure | Date: 2012-05-03 14:18:27 |
| Subject: Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return
declaration of generic record function calls ? |
| Previous: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2012-05-03 14:13:53 |
| Subject: Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn |