Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks
Date: 2010-01-03 00:47:22
Message-ID: 22465.1262479642@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On lr, 2010-01-02 at 17:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> As for the overhead, these queries are not zero-maintenance.  I still
>> think that the usefulness of tab completion here is pretty darn
>> minimal,
>> since most people are more likely to rely on default_do_language;

> We really don't have any data on that, and it doesn't seem all that
> likely to me.

I'm not really objecting to putting in the patch entirely.  I'm objecting
to carrying an extra completion query for it.  I don't think hiding
languages with laninline=0 improves its usefulness at all, let alone
enough to justify extra maintenance burden.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-01-03 01:04:10
Subject: Re: PATCH: Add hstore_to_json()
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-01-03 00:42:51
Subject: Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group