Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>,Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>,Chris Campbell <chris(at)bignerdranch(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?
Date: 2004-06-04 05:10:08
Message-ID: 22444.1086325808@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The following patch adds start/stop times for pg_dump and pg_dumpall

What happens in a pg_dump -Fc / pg_restore scenario?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: mike gDate: 2004-06-04 05:35:05
Subject: upper() / lower() regression test case needed?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-06-04 05:03:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2004-06-04 08:26:19
Subject: Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-06-04 05:03:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group