Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-06-28 19:10:13
Message-ID: 2242.1277752213@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> While I would personally prefer to have an operator for the slicing
> opeeration, I'm not willing to spend time arguing about it. So, +1 to
> implement the subset operation as the function slice(), and defer having
> an operator until later.

Yeah, I think the consensus is to avoid picking an operator name at all.
"slice()" is OK by me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Chernow 2010-06-28 19:13:09 Re: Keepalives win32
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-06-28 19:10:11 Re: Keepalives win32