Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
Cc: Ryan Kirkpatrick <rkirkpat(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Date: 2000-12-27 23:10:07
Message-ID: 22248.977958607@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
> this patch fixes the SEGV problem in the regression tests. the only 
> remaining failures, which are not due to SEGV, are:
>   oid                  ... FAILED
>   float8               ... FAILED
>   geometry             ... FAILED

What are the regression diffs, exactly?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Brent VernerDate: 2000-12-27 23:35:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Previous:From: Brent VernerDate: 2000-12-27 23:05:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Brent VernerDate: 2000-12-27 23:35:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Previous:From: Brent VernerDate: 2000-12-27 23:05:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group