Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] pg_arch.c call to sleep()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_arch.c call to sleep()
Date: 2004-11-17 17:56:46
Message-ID: 22248.1100714206@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I take this as confirmation that calling pg_usleep is the Right Thing (tm).
> Here's the patch.

Applied.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-11-17 18:50:00
Subject: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-11-17 17:47:03
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] cygwin build failure

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-11-17 18:06:46
Subject: Re: Small patch for regression tests
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-11-17 17:47:03
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] cygwin build failure

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group