Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proceeding with gettext

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proceeding with gettext
Date: 2001-05-30 16:32:33
Message-ID: 22172.991240353@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Peter, can you give a little sample of how an elog() call would look in
>> the new system?  Thanks.

> No change.

Wouldn't there need to be changes in the %-escape usage in elog message
strings?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-05-30 17:04:00
Subject: Re: Proceeding with gettext
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-05-30 16:30:23
Subject: Re: Support for %TYPE in CREATE FUNCTION

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group