> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> * Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
>> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
>> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
>> someone else would like to take a look? This is an open item, so we
>> should really try to deal with it.
> Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item. Will look at it
> tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather
> around here: the power stays on).
I've applied that patch after some revisions.
The only thing still showing as open in the CommitFest webpage is
the last plperl patch. I think that's actually done but not marked
as committed; Andrew?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-02-18 01:40:31|
|Subject: Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken|
|Previous:||From: Michael Clemmons||Date: 2010-02-18 01:04:12|
|Subject: Michael Clemmons wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn|