Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
Date: 2010-02-18 01:32:25
Message-ID: 22156.1266456745@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> * Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
>> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
>> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
>> someone else would like to take a look? This is an open item, so we
>> should really try to deal with it.

> Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item. Will look at it
> tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather
> around here: the power stays on).

I've applied that patch after some revisions.

The only thing still showing as open in the CommitFest webpage is
the last plperl patch. I think that's actually done but not marked
as committed; Andrew?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-02-18 01:40:31 Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken
Previous Message Michael Clemmons 2010-02-18 01:04:12 Michael Clemmons wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn