Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
Date: 2010-02-18 01:32:25
Message-ID: 22156.1266456745@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> * Fix large object support in pg_dump.  I think this is just waiting
>> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct.  I've been
>> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
>> someone else would like to take a look?  This is an open item, so we
>> should really try to deal with it.

> Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item.  Will look at it
> tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather
> around here: the power stays on).

I've applied that patch after some revisions.

The only thing still showing as open in the CommitFest webpage is
the last plperl patch.  I think that's actually done but not marked
as committed; Andrew?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-02-18 01:40:31
Subject: Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken
Previous:From: Michael ClemmonsDate: 2010-02-18 01:04:12
Subject: Michael Clemmons wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group