Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #6307: intarray extention gin index does not work with Hot standby

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Maxim Boguk <maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #6307: intarray extention gin index does not work with Hot standby
Date: 2011-11-25 18:33:42
Message-ID: 22029.1322246022@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Maxim Boguk <maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I know GIST on intarray[] do not have that problem.
> Very likely the problem is limited to intarray[] GIN indexes only
> (but I going to test some other not-well known GIN indexes tomorrow).

> Broken FTS indexes on Hot Standby should be known years before.

You might think that, but you'd be wrong :-(.  ginRedoUpdateMetapage
is failing to restore the contents of the pending-list correctly,
which means this is broken for all types of GIN indexes.  Will fix.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-11-26 17:45:47
Subject: Re: BUG #6310: Startup Script
Previous:From: Sidar LopezDate: 2011-11-25 16:21:25
Subject: BUG #6310: Startup Script

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group