Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: AW: Big 7.1 open items

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Subject: AW: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-29 07:44:33
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C605BA59A9@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> >>>> I've been assuming that we would create a separate tablespace for
> >>>> each database, which would be the location of that database's
> >>>> system tables.  It's probably also the default 
> tablespace for user
> >>>> tables created in that database, though it wouldn't have to be.
> 
> > I think I would prefer the ability to place more than one 
> database into 
> > the same tablespace.
> 
> You can put user tables from multiple databases into the same
> tablespace, under this proposal.  Just not system tables.

Yes, but then it is only half baked.

Andreas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zeugswetter Andreas SBDate: 2000-06-29 08:00:06
Subject: AW: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Previous:From: Zeugswetter Andreas SBDate: 2000-06-29 07:43:14
Subject: AW: AW: Big 7.1 open items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group