Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: Big 7.1 open items

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Subject: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-28 07:36:08
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C605BA599F@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > I've been assuming that we would create a separate tablespace for
> > each database, which would be the location of that database's
> > system tables.  It's probably also the default tablespace for user
> > tables created in that database, though it wouldn't have to be.

I think I would prefer the ability to place more than one database into 
the same tablespace.

Andreas

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zeugswetter Andreas SBDate: 2000-06-28 07:48:54
Subject: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Previous:From: Zeugswetter Andreas SBDate: 2000-06-28 07:27:27
Subject: AW: Big 7.1 open items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group