AW: More Performance

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: More Performance
Date: 2000-05-25 15:51:13
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C604AF7DA6@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > Here I must slightly disagree, if the impact of vacuum
> > without analyze is so bad, then analyze should be the
> > default for vacuum.
>
> *Must not* - it takes long time. Imho, there should be
> ANALYZE command, with ACCESS SHARE lock...

Yes, I agree that reducing the default selectivity estimator
is the much better solution.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed Loehr 2000-05-25 15:51:23 vacuum analyze feedback
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-05-25 15:47:52 AW: Berkeley DB...