Re: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs

From: Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs
Date: 1998-11-30 10:08:28
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60180FAA8@sdexcsrv1.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> Another question is whether a SERIAL field should automatically
be
>>> UNIQUE (ie, create a unique index on it to prevent mistakes in
manual
>>> insertion of values for the field).
>
>> Once again - I would like to see SERIAL compatible with
>> SERIAL/IDENTY in other RDBMSes.
>
>Yes, and? What do the other ones do?

In Informix you need to create the unique index explicitly. I like this
because it keeps
things flexible. The unique constraint could be on a compount key.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-11-30 10:31:10 Re: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs
Previous Message Akmal Hasan 1998-11-30 09:27:08 How to build Distributed Databases with JDBC and PostgreSQL?