Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs

From: Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs
Date: 1998-11-30 10:08:28
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60180FAA8@sdexcsrv1.sd.spardat.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
	>>> Another question is whether a SERIAL field should automatically
be
	>>> UNIQUE (ie, create a unique index on it to prevent mistakes in
manual
	>>> insertion of values for the field).
	>
	>> Once again - I would like to see SERIAL compatible with
	>> SERIAL/IDENTY in other RDBMSes.
	>
	>Yes, and?  What do the other ones do?

In Informix you need to create the unique index explicitly. I like this
because it keeps
things flexible. The unique constraint could be on a compount key.

Andreas


Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vadim MikheevDate: 1998-11-30 10:31:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DROPping tables with SERIALs
Previous:From: Akmal HasanDate: 1998-11-30 09:27:08
Subject: How to build Distributed Databases with JDBC and PostgreSQL?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group