Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.1beta, SunOS and shmget

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>,"Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.1beta, SunOS and shmget
Date: 2005-08-30 15:28:47
Message-ID: 21970.1125415727@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> writes:
> On Aug 29, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I just finished going through the initialization sequence to trace the
>> calculation of shared memory size, and what I find in CVS tip is that
>> it works out like this:

> Should the new formulation be sent to pgsql-docs? This looks like it  
> could be worked into a patch pretty easily. Seems like it would make  
> sense to update the docs for 8.1...

Already done.
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/kernel-resources.html#SYSVIPC

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Luke LonerganDate: 2005-08-30 15:45:40
Subject: Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-30 14:52:09
Subject: Re: Performance gain from reduction of GROUP BY memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group