Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
Date: 2011-09-06 21:07:56
Message-ID: 21932.1315343276@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This comment seems inaccurate and bizarrely placed.  What question
>> were you trying to answer?

> It was in response to my email where I asked why we are sending cache
> invalidation messages for temporary tables that can't be seen by any
> other backends:
> 	http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg00844.php

Oh.  OK, I cleaned it up a bit.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-09-06 21:19:02
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-09-06 21:07:13
Subject: pgsql: Improve comment about handling of temp tables in shared-invalco

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group