Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This comment seems inaccurate and bizarrely placed.  What question
>> were you trying to answer?

> It was in response to my email where I asked why we are sending cache
> invalidation messages for temporary tables that can't be seen by any
> other backends:
> 	http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg00844.php

Oh.  OK, I cleaned it up a bit.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for at 2011-09-06 20:39:09 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for at 2011-09-06 21:19:02 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2011-09-06 21:19:02
	Subject: Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-09-06 21:07:13
	Subject: pgsql: Improve comment about handling of temp tables in shared-invalco