| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 |
| Date: | 2010-03-10 22:55:17 |
| Message-ID: | 21881.1268261717@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Time to remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age, I think.
>>
>> Umm, so what's the bug?
> Whether you call it a bug or just an annoyance is debatable, but the
> source of it is clear.
Maybe to you, but the rest of us would like to know.
> Given the lack of effectiveness, I propose
> removing it.
I read Josh's recent report at
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B973C3F.9070501@agliodbs.com
to say that it's quite effective. I think you're being way too hasty to
decide that it can just be dropped.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-03-10 23:26:06 | Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-03-10 22:45:25 | Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-03-10 23:26:06 | Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-03-10 22:45:25 | Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 |