Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Date: 2009-09-26 15:59:07
Message-ID: 21863.1253980747@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Right, that works. Updated patch attached; should solve the issues
> raised in the thread. I renamed the catalog pg_db_role_setting as
> suggested by Tom.
> ...
> I have also added a view, whose only purpose is to convert the role and
> database OIDs into names. It's been named pg_db_role_settings, but if
> anyone has a better suggestion I'm all ears.

I dislike the idea of having a catalog and a view whose names are the
same except for a plural. It's confusing as heck, because no one will
remember which is which.

Since pg_settings is the existing user view, I think pg_db_role_settings
is a reasonable choice for the new view, but then we need a different
name for the catalog. The only thing that comes to mind right now is
"pg_db_role_default", but I don't like it much. Anybody have other
suggestions?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-26 16:02:38 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Unicode escapes in E'...' strings Author: Marko Kreen
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-09-26 15:50:29 Re: WIP - syslogger infrastructure changes