Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Large C files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large C files
Date: 2011-09-08 14:25:14
Message-ID: 21787.1315491914@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Please lets not waste effort on refactoring efforts in mid dev cycle.

>> Say what? When else would you have us do it?

> When else would you have us develop?

In my eyes that sort of activity *is* development.  I find the
distinction you are drawing entirely artificial, and more calculated to
make sure refactoring never happens than to add any safety.  Any
significant development change carries a risk of breakage.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-09-08 14:28:43
Subject: Re: concurrent snapshots
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-09-08 14:19:50
Subject: Re: cheaper snapshots redux

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group