| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Large C files |
| Date: | 2011-09-08 14:25:14 |
| Message-ID: | 21787.1315491914@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Please lets not waste effort on refactoring efforts in mid dev cycle.
>> Say what? When else would you have us do it?
> When else would you have us develop?
In my eyes that sort of activity *is* development. I find the
distinction you are drawing entirely artificial, and more calculated to
make sure refactoring never happens than to add any safety. Any
significant development change carries a risk of breakage.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-08 14:28:43 | Re: concurrent snapshots |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-08 14:19:50 | Re: cheaper snapshots redux |