Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE
Date: 2000-05-28 05:36:04
Message-ID: 2176.959492164@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> I saw some errors on the regression test, and they are new to me.
> Here are the output from checkresults.

> ====== rules ======
> 1168d1167
> < pg_indexes | SELECT c.relname AS tablename, i.relname AS indexname, pg_get_indexdef(x.indexrelid) AS indexdef FROM pg_index x, pg_class c, pg_class i WHERE ((c.oid = x.indrelid) AND (i.oid = x.indexrelid));
> 1187c1186
> < (20 rows)
> ---
>> (19 rows)
> ====== foreign_key ======
> 11a12
>> NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 726
> 235a237
>> NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 726

> I guess the error on foreign_key is caused by -d 3 turned on(does this
> hurt anything?) But what about the rules?

The NOTICEs are caused by a known omission: the foreign-key boys didn't
bother to add an outfuncs.c routine for node type FkConstraint. Should
be pretty harmless AFAIK. The rules discrepancy is much more
disturbing. Is it repeatable?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Zeugswetter 2000-05-28 07:30:38 RE: Berkeley DB...
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-05-28 05:30:30 Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE