Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE
Date: 2000-05-28 05:36:04
Message-ID: 2176.959492164@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> I saw some errors on the regression test, and they are new to me.
> Here are the output from checkresults.

> ======   rules   ======
> 1168d1167
> <  pg_indexes         | SELECT c.relname AS tablename, i.relname AS indexname, pg_get_indexdef(x.indexrelid) AS indexdef FROM pg_index x, pg_class c, pg_class i WHERE ((c.oid = x.indrelid) AND (i.oid = x.indexrelid));
> 1187c1186
> < (20 rows)
> ---
>> (19 rows)
> ======   foreign_key   ======
> 11a12
>> NOTICE:  _outNode: don't know how to print type 726 
> 235a237
>> NOTICE:  _outNode: don't know how to print type 726 

> I guess the error on foreign_key is caused by -d 3 turned on(does this
> hurt anything?) But what about the rules?

The NOTICEs are caused by a known omission: the foreign-key boys didn't
bother to add an outfuncs.c routine for node type FkConstraint.  Should
be pretty harmless AFAIK.  The rules discrepancy is much more
disturbing.  Is it repeatable?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andreas ZeugswetterDate: 2000-05-28 07:30:38
Subject: RE: Berkeley DB...
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2000-05-28 05:30:30
Subject: Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group