Re: Patch list delay

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch list delay
Date: 2001-08-22 22:11:49
Message-ID: 21739.998518309@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am getting presistant requests from people asking why their patches
> haven't appeared on the patches list yet. I have had it happen to me.

I believe part of the problem is that pgsql-patches has the same size
limit (40K IIRC) as all the other lists for messages to go through
without approval.

ISTM that for pgsql-patches a larger limit would be appropriate, at
least a couple hundred K.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-22 22:18:32 Assessment on namespace clean include file names
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-22 20:44:44 Remove --enable-syslog?